Stop EXMO20

Strategic Planning Committee

3 March 2026

Second consultation responses.

Morning recording ▶ · Afternoon recording ▶ · agenda and papers · official minutes (PDF on the council website)

Summary of our findings

EXMO20 came up a lot in the morning session. It was the main subject of the public speaking, the officer reported the 1,500 consultation responses on the site, and Cllr Brian Bailey asked about its access road through the 400 m Pebblebed Heaths buffer and why the site is still being pursued. The HRA and air quality discussion covers the Pebblebed Heaths next to the site, and the water cycle study item covered Maer Lane (Exmouth) and overflows in the area. The allocation itself was not voted on: the committee only noted the Local Plan update.

  • Public speaking: four members of the public spoke in person and a fifth person's written statement was read out. All raised EXMO20, the Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA), air quality, access, objection numbers or housing numbers.
  • Local Plan update: officers reported about 3,200 comments from about 750 respondents at the second Regulation 19 consultation (closed 26 January 2026), with about 1,500 on EXMO20. A full feedback report is due at the next meeting. The committee noted the report and endorsed the programme by 11 votes to 1 (Cllr Brian Bailey against).
  • HRA and air quality on the Pebblebed Heaths: the officer said there is no clear mitigation strategy yet. Ricardo's air quality modelling is being rerun and feeds into the HRA by Footprint Ecology. Technical reports must be ready for submission by about 12 June 2026, and the timetable would have to be revisited if a satisfactory HRA cannot be reached.
  • Cllr Brian Bailey asked about the proposed EXMO20 access opposite the archery club, inside the 400 m heathland buffer. The officer said the buffer is not a no-development zone and that no homes would be built within it.
  • Cllr Brian Bailey also questioned why EXMO20 is being pursued, given Exmouth's need for affordable homes, infrastructure and sewerage. The chair answered, pointing to the infrastructure delivery plan and the 35% affordable housing policy.
  • East Devon Water Cycle Study: officers reported significant wastewater capacity problems, including at Maer Lane (Exmouth) and Countess Wear, and said no material changes to the Local Plan are expected. The committee noted the study unanimously, with recommendation 2 reworded in the meeting to stress further work with the Environment Agency and South West Water and the Environment Agency's enforcement role.
  • Cranbrook Category 4 infrastructure: the mechanism for allocating contributions was recommended to Cabinet (10 for, 1 abstention).
  • Habitat mitigation non-infrastructure contributions were raised to £790.41 (Exe Estuary), £804.64 (Pebblebed Heaths) and £825.41 (both) per dwelling, for applications received after 1 April 2026. This was agreed unanimously, with Cllr Jung not voting.
  • The council's response to the government's December 2025 NPPF consultation was agreed unanimously. The officer said AI had been used to draft parts of it.

EXMO20 is named 12 times in the transcript of this meeting.

Quotes from this meeting in our case

…the mitigation measures will not have to be as unachievable, shall we say…Ed Freeman, 3 March 2026, 00:44:10 · play ▶ · 1. Habitats Regulations: harm to the Pebble Bed Heaths not ruled out, and avoidance not tried
…they were quite clear that they just don't have the data…Ed Freeman, 3 March 2026, 01:55:13 · play ▶ · 4. Not “effective”: access and sewage capacity unproven
…we don't have to go through and check every individual one, but, you know, the general sense check.Ed Freeman, 3 March 2026, 00:58:38 · play ▶ · 7. Procedural and consultation flaws

What the Minutes Missed

Minutes are a summary, not a word-for-word record. Below are points from the recording that matter for EXMO20 or the Local Plan, set against what the official minutes say about them. Judge for yourself: each clip opens at the moment it was said.

Mitigation depends on rerunning the modelling with higher electric vehicle uptake

Important Minutes much briefer · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 00:44:44 ▶

Said in the meeting“So I'm hoping when they rerun the modelling, we'll get to a point where we will naturally see the impacts in terms of vehicle movements over the pebbleheads declining, such that the mitigation measures will not have to be as unachievable, shall we say, that we'll be able to achieve the outcomes that are needed.”
The minutesWhile no definitive mitigation strategy is in place at present, it was advised that the independent consultants Ricardo have identified potential measures, including encouraging the uptake of electric vehicles

The officer said the council thinks the current modelling takes 'quite a pessimistic view' of electric vehicle uptake, and that the measures might otherwise be 'unachievable'. The minutes do not record either point.

EXMO20 access road inside the 400 m Pebblebed Heaths buffer

Important Not in the minutes · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 00:55:10 ▶

Said in the meeting“…it's obviously not ideal to have the access there but it's not something that you can't have within the 400 meter buffer zone and I think as we've said in the plan and in the allocation there won't be any homes within the 400 meter buffer zone…”
The minutesNot recorded in the minutes.

Cllr Brian Bailey asked (00:50:06) whether access through the heathland buffer fits the new NPPF. The officer confirmed the access would be opposite the archery club. The minutes record neither question nor answer.

Vote on the Local Plan update: 11 for, 1 against, no debate

Important Not in the minutes · Cllr Todd Olive (chair) · Morning 01:14:06 ▶

Said in the meeting“…I think I count 11 for jess is voting yes yes she is hidden by Councillor Davey I think that's everybody apart from brian is that right yeah can I ask for those against. That is one, Councillor Bailey, which means no abstention, so that is clearly carried.”
The minutesThat the contents of the report be noted and the proposed programme of works going forward be endorsed.

The minutes give the resolution but not the vote: 11 for and 1 against (Cllr Brian Bailey). They also do not record that no member spoke in the debate (01:13:32 to 01:13:55).

Water cycle study came late; spatial strategy could not change

Important Not in the minutes · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 02:13:29 ▶

Said in the meeting“…so the the strategy um couldn't really have have flexed to reflect what's coming forward in terms of the water cycle study um I think this is a point the environment agency raised in terms of the study coming forward quite late in the in the process…”
The minutesNot recorded in the minutes.

The officer said the Environment Agency had raised the study's late arrival in the plan process, and that the spatial strategy could not have changed because of it. The study was commissioned about three years earlier.

Councillor's concern that the HRA air quality problem has no solution yet

Minutes much briefer · Cllr Geoff Jung · Morning 00:38:17 ▶

Said in the meeting“Habitat Regulations assessment, really good report. It says what the problem is. I don't see how we can overcome. There's no report of how we're going to overcome that yet.”
The minutesFurther information was sought on how air quality impacts could be addressed on the Pebblebed Heaths.

A committee member said there was not yet any way to overcome the air quality impact on the Pebblebed Heaths, which the HRA has to show. The minutes record only a request for information.

Consequences of not having an up-to-date plan

Not in the minutes · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 00:53:18 ▶

Said in the meeting“What happens if we don't have a plan? Well, we would continue to not have a five-year housing land supply, probably. So we retain the position of having the tilted balance in play and having to give substantial weight to developments that are bolstering the housing land supply position.”
The minutesNot recorded in the minutes.

This was officer advice on what happens without a plan (the tilted balance continues, and as the 'ultimate sanction' the government could write the plan). It bears on how members weighed keeping the plan, including EXMO20, on its timetable.

Heathland land management described as the least attractive mitigation option

Minutes differ · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 01:00:34 ▶

Said in the meeting“…one option in terms of of mitigation um which is probably sort of the least attractive option but an option is to um do actual physical works within the buffer areas to the size of the roads to address the impact of the sort of pollution on the ground…”
The minutesIt was suggested that such planting could help address pollution impacts at ground level and potentially improve soil nutrient conditions.

The officer said it was 'not so much planting new vegetation' but treating the soil. He described this as a possible short-term fallback, paid for by developer contributions and agreed with the landowners. The minutes record it as planting.

Chair's reply on EXMO20, affordable housing and viability

Minutes much briefer · Cllr Todd Olive (chair) · Morning 01:11:04 ▶

Said in the meeting“…the plan, particularly on affordable housing, is genuinely pushing the boundaries of what we can get away with under the rules around viability.”
The minutesThe Chair reminded the Committee that it had previously agreed the affordable housing policy, which provides for 35% affordable housing, comprising 70% shared ownership and 30% social rent.

The chair's reply covered the infrastructure delivery plan and viability limits on affordable housing. No officer answered why EXMO20 is being pursued, and the minutes do not show this.

Water cycle study: South West Water information a limiting factor

Minutes much briefer · Ed Freeman (officer) · Morning 01:32:22 ▶

Said in the meeting“…there are other issues where they're sort of highlighting that um the absence of information being forthcoming from southwest water was a limiting factor uh shall we say in some in terms of some of these aspects of the study…”
The minutesFeedback has been requested from the consultants, Haskoning, and from South West Water, with the intention of obtaining additional data and information to update and amend the study in order to address the concerns raised.

The officer reported the consultants' view that missing South West Water data limited the study, and that South West Water disagrees with some findings (01:38:40). The minutes do not record either point.

Councillor on rising sewage overflows in the Exmouth area

Not in the minutes · Cllr Brian Bailey · Morning 01:59:38 ▶

Said in the meeting“…I'd like to draw your attention to page 62 of the report, I beg your pardon, yes, 62, Table 5-9, which states and gives you all the details of the overspills for Expo area from 2018 to 2024 which are increasing exponentially according to this report.”
The minutesNot recorded in the minutes.

This cites the study's overflow data for the area transcribed as 'Expo' (probably Exmouth), which is relevant to EXMO20 and Maer Lane. The councillor asked whether the council would act on it.

Who attended

From the council's own attendance record for this meeting. Members of the public who spoke are not named here.

Chair and vice-chair (2)

  • Councillor Mike Howe – Vice-Chair
  • Councillor Todd Olive – Chair

Committee members present (10)

  • Councillor Brian Bailey
  • Councillor Jessica Bailey
  • Councillor Kevin Blakey
  • Councillor Olly Davey
  • Councillor Peter Faithfull
  • Councillor Paula Fernley
  • Councillor Charlotte Fitzgerald
  • Councillor Geoff Jung
  • Councillor Yehudi Levine
  • Councillor Helen Parr

Committee members who sent apologies (3)

  • Councillor Paul Hayward
  • Councillor Ben Ingham
  • Councillor Dan Ledger

Other councillors attending (2)

  • Councillor Ian Barlow
  • Councillor Roy Collins

Officers (3)

  • Ed Freeman
  • Wendy Harris
  • Damian Hunter

Listed (attendance not confirmed) (1)

  • Hal Furneaux-Gotch – Officer

Notes on the recording

  • Public speaking: the printed minutes (minute 47) record four public speakers and a statement read out on behalf of a fifth person. All five contributions appear in the transcript used here, from 00:12:40 to about 00:30:00. That transcript was made on 09 Nov 2026 from video m_9GceKkmuk and is 02:52:01 long. This check did not confirm whether the version now on YouTube still contains that section.
  • After the public speaking, the officer answered the housing-numbers statement and the chair responded to comments made against the council (00:29:50 to 00:33:46). Minute 47 records both: the 80% transition arrangements, the headroom and the complaints process and judicial review. It does not record the officer's point about the 15-year plan period if the plan is not adopted by the end of 2027.
  • The comparison uses the council's printed minutes PDF, which has the full text of every minute. The online meeting page cuts off minutes 47 and 51.
  • Water cycle study recommendation 2 was reworded in the meeting (chair's version at 02:44:04, then split into two sub-clauses at Cllr Davey's request). The final text is not read out on the recording (gap 02:47:40 to 02:49:36). The printed minutes give it in full, adding Natural England and 'other stakeholders'. The vote was unanimous; the minutes give the resolution but not the vote.
  • The recording starts at 00:07:41. There is a break in the morning recording from 01:14:44 to 01:26:38.
  • The attendance page lists Cllr Hayward as apologies, but at 00:10:52 the clerk says he is 'arriving a little bit later'. He does not appear to speak.
  • Cllr Jung's interest for item 10 (habitat mitigation) was declared during that item (00:18:17 to 00:20:17 in the afternoon) rather than at the start. The minutes record it under declarations.
  • This is a machine transcript with errors such as 'Exxon 20' and 'Eczema' for Exmo 20, 'Young' for Jung, 'Expo' and 'Exeter' where Exmouth seems meant, and 'Malcombe' for Marlcombe.